Trackbacks

• Trackbacks are closed for this post.

Comments

• 1/14/2009 4:23 PM Barbara wrote:
  Is this good or bad? environmentally I know he wanted good things- but didnt he do things with Swan Point members money that they didnt agree with in the MIRANT case or the Swan Point expansion?
  Reply to this
• 1/18/2009 10:42 AM Ken Robinson wrote:
  I would submit that you do not have your facts correct and would be happy to discuss that with you.
  Reply to this
• 2/1/2009 4:24 PM annie wrote:
  I would submit that Barbara may have her facts more correct than Mr. Robinson cares to admit and apparently wishes to "discuss" his way out of the recent history of Swan Point. More people know the facts than Mr. R. may have realized. While he would have us believe that he cares about the environment, his relationship with the developers of Swan Point were extremely close and to the point where his actions were questionable at best. He seems to pick and choose when he'll stand up for the environment. And worse than that - it's one thing to remain quiet --- it's quite another to openly advocate and stack the deck in favor of, large scale development in a fragile and environmentally sensitive area. Mr. Robinson - a windmill doesn't un-do the damage you have done.
  Reply to this

Leave a comment